Anesthesia Technique May Affect Survival After Breast Cancer Surgery: StudyBy Kathleen Doheny
TUESDAY, Oct. 15 (HealthDay News) -- The anesthesia technique used during breast cancer surgery may affect cancer recurrence and survival, Danish researchers report.
In a small study that followed 77 breast cancer patients, researchers found the combination of a general anesthetic plus injections of a nerve block resulted in increased survival and fewer recurrences, said Dr. Palle Steen Carlsson, a researcher at the Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark.
A six-year follow-up found that 13 percent of patients who got the combination had their cancer recur versus 37 percent of those who got anesthesia alone. And 10 percent of those in the combination group died compared to 32 percent of those given anesthesia alone.
The idea that the anesthesia technique used during breast cancer surgery affects results is evolving, anesthesiologists say, and needs more study. Carlsson found a link between the two, but her study didn't show a direct cause-and-effect relationship. She is scheduled to report her findings Oct. 15 at the American Society of Anesthesiologists' annual meeting in San Francisco.
Carlsson acknowledged the study's limitations. "The weakness of our study is the size," she said.
During cancer surgery, tumor cells released into the blood can implant in lymph nodes and other organs, she said. The immune system kicks in to fight these cells, but surgery and anesthesia can impair the immune system.
Carlsson can't say for sure why women who got the nerve block plus anesthesia tended to fare better. One theory is that better pain relief during and after surgery reduces the stress response to the procedure, she said. Or perhaps the need for fewer narcotic painkillers after surgery reduces the risk of cancer spreading.
In the study, Carlsson randomly assigned the 77 patients to general anesthesia plus injections of saline or general anesthesia plus injections of local anesthetic (this is called a paravertebral block) about an inch from the middle of the spine.
Besides differences in recurrence and survival, medical records six years later showed fewer opioids for pain relief were needed by the women who got the combination approach.
In an earlier study, researchers found that the combination of general anesthesia and regional anesthesia reduced recurrences and the spread of breast cancer four-fold, but that study looked back at medical records. Carlsson said her study is believed to be the first to follow patients forward.
The concept has been a hot topic for several years among anesthesiologists, said Dr. Michael Lew, professor and chairman of anesthesiology at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, Calif. Lew was not involved in the study.
"[This study] is exciting and a step in the right direction," he said. "However, [Carlsson] is correct in saying there needs to be more numbers."
More information is expected soon, Lew said, citing a clinical trial under way at the Cleveland Clinic and elsewhere. It will compare different anesthesia approaches used in more than 1,100 breast cancer patients over five years and evaluate differences in outcomes.
Until more findings are in, Lew suggested that women facing breast cancer surgery tell their surgeon they want a general anesthetic with as few opioids as possible. "The opioids inhibit natural killer cells [that attack roaming cancer cells]," he said.
Lew said he sometimes gives a general anesthetic plus intravenous anti-inflammatory medicine to combat pain.
Studies presented at meetings typically are considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
SOURCES: Palle Carlsson, M.D., Ph.D., researcher, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Michael Lew, M.D., professor and chairman of anesthesiology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, Calif.; Oct. 15, 2013, presentation, American Society of Anesthesiology annual meeting, San Francisco